See what products need feedback — testing, surveys, interviews. Each bounty shows what to do and how much it pays.
Sign up with Google or GitHub. Express interest with a quick pitch. The founder picks who does the work.
Try the product, write your feedback, submit your deliverable. Most bounties take 15–60 minutes.
Founder reviews and approves. Payment goes to your PayPal or Venmo on your next cash-out.
Transparent fees. No surprises.
Example: you complete $50 in bounties
First cash-out bonus
Minimum cash-out: $50 in approved bounties. Paid via PayPal or Venmo.
10% platform fee is the only fee. No hidden charges. No sign-up cost.
First-time bonus of $10 added automatically on your first cash-out.
No coding required. Your honest feedback is the skill.
Try a product for 15 minutes. Write what confused you, what worked, what broke.
Join a 20-minute call with a founder to share your perspective on their product or market.
Fill out a structured survey about a product, feature, or market. Written responses.
Real bounties from real products. Claim one and start earning.
Test segment: US-based Parents Sending Gifts. Indian diaspora parents aged 35-55 in North America earning $100k+ annually who want to send food gifts to adult children or elderly parents in India on birthdays, anniversaries, and festivals. Why this segment: High emotional motivation and disposable income to pay premium prices for convenience; infrequent but high-value orders ($50-200) make unit economics work despite shipping costs.
Compare 3–5 competing products. Write a short report on strengths and weaknesses.
Sign up for a product and document every step. Screenshot the confusing parts.
Research a market, find data points, summarize trends. Great for business students.
Join a video call to share your honest perspective on the product, the problem it solves, and who would use it.
Find data on the market this product operates in. How big is it? Who are the customers? Is it growing?
Test segment: Civic-Minded Professionals 40-65. College-educated professionals (lawyers, educators, business owners) in smaller cities and towns who actively participate in local governance, planning boards, or civic organizations and consume news 3+ times daily. Why this segment: This segment has high engagement with local news as a utility rather than entertainment and the premium for distraction-free, high-quality journalism aligns with their values and professional need for reliable local information.
Test segment: Retirees 65+ Urban Neighborhoods. Recently retired or semi-retired individuals living in established urban neighborhoods who have stable fixed incomes, read local news to stay connected to their community, and avoid smartphones/apps when possible. Why this segment: This segment values community connection, has time to read deeply, and their preference for clean, ad-free experiences makes them willing to pay a modest subscription to avoid the clutter of modern news sites.
Test segment: Suburban Parents 35-50. Parents in mid-size metros (200k-1M population) who read local news daily to stay informed about schools, safety, and community events, and have household incomes $80k-150k. Why this segment: This segment has demonstrated willingness to pay for family-oriented services and the $10/month family plan directly addresses their need to keep children informed about local issues without algorithmic distraction.
Find 5 people who might use this product. Ask them about the problem it solves and whether they'd pay for a solution.
Research competing products in this space. Compare features, pricing, and positioning.
Sign up as a new user and document every step. Note where you got stuck or confused.
Spend 15 minutes using the product. Write down what worked, what confused you, and what broke. Screenshots encouraged.
Test segment: Open Source Project Maintainers. Individual contributors and maintainers of popular GitHub repositories (10k-1M stars) who struggle with contributor onboarding and want to lower barriers for new contributors to understand project architecture. Why this segment: They have a clear activation problem (new contributors don't understand the codebase), minimal budget constraints, and would use the tool directly on their own repos with built-in distribution via their communities.
Test segment: Engineering Team Leads. Engineering managers at mid-size tech companies (50-500 engineers) responsible for onboarding, knowledge retention, and team cohesion across codebases they own. Why this segment: They have direct budget authority, recurring pain around codebase literacy and team alignment, and already run internal knowledge-sharing sessions where gamified learning could increase engagement.
Test segment: CS/Data Science Educators. University instructors and bootcamp curriculum leads who teach programming and want to make lectures interactive and reduce plagiarism by using real, messy codebases as teaching material. Why this segment: They need low-cost engagement tools, have captive audiences with strong intrinsic motivation, and teaching real open-source repositories aligns directly with practical skill-building goals.